WebA. Hall v. Clifton Precision In 1993, in Hall v. Clifton Precision, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania addressed the situation where, during the plaintiff’s … WebDec 3, 1993 · Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525, 527 (E.D.Pa. 1993). Counsel for both parties engaged in extensive colloquy which interrupted the flow of the deposition, and made for inefficient use of everyone's time. Mr. Barrett repeatedly objected to the form of Mr. Young's questions.
Depositions: When Can You Still Talk to Your Own Witness?
WebIn the widely-cited opinion in Hall v. Clifton Precision, the court gave the following explanation of the rules governing consultations between a deponent and his or her counsel during a deposition: The underlying purpose of a deposition is to find out what a witness saw, heard, or did— what the witness thinks. WebHall v. Clifton Precision The Hall case is the seminal case on lawyer conduct in depositions. You need to study this case to know what is and is not acceptable conduct in deposition. The opinion specifically deals with speaking objections during a deposition and has great quotable language such as, security officer jobs slc utah
Depositions: You Can’t Do That - American Bar Association
WebApr 30, 1998 · In Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D.Pa. 1993), cited by plaintiffs, the court limited discussions between counsel and the witness being deposed' as follows: Once the deposition has begun, the preparation period is over and the deposing lawyer is entitled to pursue the chosen line of inquiry without interruption by the witness's ... WebJul 29, 1993 · In Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D. Pa. 1993), the case relied on by Respondents, the federal district court emphatically found that "conferences between … purveyor steakhouse